Deep Something

What a Real Hillsborough County Efficiency Review Would Look Like

July 28, 2026 B. John 243 Views 0 Comments Hillsborough County DOGE, county spending, government efficiency, audit standards, budget transparency, transaction testing, program outcomes, cost shifting, public accountability

This entry is in the series Hillsborough DOGE Report Analysis

The Hillsborough County DOGE report raised important questions. However, a true efficiency review must go beyond highlighting large figures. It should test transactions, compare costs, assess workloads, evaluate results, and consider the impact of service reductions.

This final essay outlines the essential elements of a comprehensive review and emphasizes that public trust relies on evidence, not headlines. The objective should be a clear, substantiated case for how each dollar will be saved, rather than the largest possible savings claim.

Culture Art Featured Places Tampa Politics County Commission

When “Waste” Becomes a Political Word Instead of a Financial One

July 26, 2026 B. John 249 Views 0 Comments government waste, county spending, Political Rhetoric, public services, taxpayer oversight, budget accountability, policy debate, Hillsborough County DOGE

This entry is in the series Hillsborough DOGE Report Analysis

“Waste” should describe money spent badly. Too often, it becomes a political label applied before anyone proves that a program failed, cost too much, or duplicated another service.

This essay looks at how that label can be used to weaken support for public programs before the facts are settled. Real waste should be cut. Political dislike should be debated honestly. Those are not the same thing.

Politics County Commission Featured Places Tampa

The DOGE Method: Lots of Documents, Limited Testing, Very Big Numbers

July 25, 2026 B. John 225 Views 0 Comments public accountability, Hillsborough County DOGE, county spending, audit standards, government waste, taxpayer oversight, contract review, budget transparency

This entry is in the series Hillsborough DOGE Report Analysis

The Hillsborough County DOGE committee reviewed a large volume of records and announced more than $678 million in possible savings. But its own report also admits that the work involved limited due diligence, no transaction-level testing, and no independent verification.

That does not make the report useless. It does mean the public should treat it as a list of leads, questions, and proposed cuts, not as proof that hundreds of millions of dollars were wasted. A lot of documents can produce a big number. They do not automatically produce an audit.

Featured Places Tampa Politics Society Technology Software Culture Crack Pots Art Hate Groups Movies County Commission Theater

Real Waste, Fake Waste, and Things Republicans Just Don’t Like

July 24, 2026July 25, 2026 B. John 230 Views 0 Comments Hillsborough County DOGE, political ideology, county grants, DEI programs, nonprofit funding, government waste, film incentives, public accountability

This entry is in the series Hillsborough DOGE Report Analysis

Not every proposed cut is the same. Unused software licenses, underused vehicles, vague contracts, and weak bidding rules are real places to look for waste.

But the Hillsborough County DOGE report also targets nonprofits, equity work, community outreach, and cultural programs. In this essay, I separate genuine control problems from programs that appear to have been labeled “waste” because committee members do not like their purpose.

Political opposition is fair. Calling it financial analysis is not.

Places Tampa Politics Society Crack Pots County Commission Featured

Cutting a Program Is Not the Same as Making Government Efficient

July 23, 2026July 25, 2026 B. John 275 Views 0 Comments Medicaid gap, voter-approved tax, Tampa General Hospital, public services, health care access, Hillsborough County DOGE, indigent health care, county spending, government efficiency

This entry is in the series Hillsborough DOGE Report Analysis

The Hillsborough County DOGE committee calls the county health care plan a source of major savings. But ending care for more than 22,000 low-income residents is not the same as making government more efficient.

This essay looks at what the program actually does, why voters approved the tax that funds it, and what happens when needed care disappears from one budget line only to reappear in emergency rooms, hospitals, charities, and family finances.

Cutting a program may make a spreadsheet look better. The harder question is whether the community pays more when the service is gone.

County Commission Featured Places Tampa Politics

Who Chose the Watchdogs?

July 23, 2026July 25, 2026 B. John 290 Views 0 Comments public accountability, Hillsborough County DOGE, committee appointments, government oversight, political influence, budget review, Jake Hoffman, county spending

This entry is in the series Hillsborough DOGE Report Analysis

Before accepting the Hillsborough County DOGE committee’s findings as a neutral review of county spending, it is worth asking who selected the people doing the reviewing.

The five-member panel included several people with solid professional backgrounds, but only one had clear forensic accounting credentials. At least three had strong Republican Party ties, including committee chair Jake Hoffman, a former Republican candidate and Young Republican leader.

This essay looks at how the committee was formed, how its members were chosen, and why a politically tilted advisory panel should not be treated like an independent audit team.

Featured Places Tampa Politics Legislature

The Empty Chairs of Tallahassee’s Brave Warriors

July 18, 2026 B. John 240 Views 0 Comments Tampa Politics, preemption laws, homeowner’s insurance reform, Florida State Senate, Republican no-show, Tiger Bay Club, legislative accountability, Hillsboroug

This entry is in the series 2026 Elections

The historic Tiger Bay Club of Tampa is known for hosting fierce, politically mixed audiences, the exact kind of room where business-friendly traditional Republicans used to enjoy a home-court advantage. Yet, at a recent Florida State Senate candidate forum following the club’s monthly luncheon, the Republican side of the dais looked like an abandoned movie set. Not a single Republican running for a State Senate seat representing Hillsborough County bothered to show up. Incumbents Nick DiCeglie and Jim Boyd, along with former House Representative Josie Tomkow, staged a coordinated vanishing act, leaving empty chairs where accountability was supposed to sit.

This missing-in-action routine isn’t just a scheduling oversight; it’s a strategic flight from a room full of constituents demanding answers. Over the last several years, this trio has marched in lockstep to strip local self-governance through state preemption while simultaneously passing disastrous property insurance “reforms” that sent premiums into the stratosphere. By refusing to face the music, and a polite crowd over a plate of chicken piccata, Hillsborough’s ghost candidates proved they would rather hide behind multimillion-dollar PAC mailers than explain why their legislative records read like a pocketbook nightmare for local taxpayers.

Tampa Politics Legislature Society Education Crack Pots Featured Places

The Price of Political Playacting: Michael Owen’s Assault on Hillsborough Schools

July 9, 2026 B. John 268 Views 0 Comments state preemption, Michael Owen, political overreach, Public Education, Hillsborough County, Culture Wars, Local Governance, school referendum

This entry is in the series 2026 Elections

Hillsborough County Public Schools, the seventh-largest district in the nation, is facing a top-down assault disguised as “local accountability.” State Representative Michael Owen’s House Bill 4027 calls for a referendum to eliminate our professionally appointed superintendent in favor of a partisan elected office. The schools are already governed by an elected board of education. This change is not about transparency; it is a calculated effort to force a toxic culture-war agenda into our local classrooms and strip our school system of seasoned, professional leadership.

The structural fallout of this power grab is devastatingly clear. Instead of an experienced educational administrator focused on student performance, our district risks being handed over to a political partisan. Under an elected model, policy decisions on curriculum, budgeting, and student safety will inevitably bow to the need for campaign survival, turning every fourth year into a multi-million-dollar reelection spectacle. This essay shows how Owen’s legislative overreach, paired with his habit of distorting local facts for political points, threatens the shared institutions our children rely on.

Featured Places Tampa Politics Legislature Society Crack Pots

Is Karen Gonzalez-Pittman Representing South Tampa or Tallahassee?

June 29, 2026 B. John 294 Views 0 Comments Home Rule, local control, Tallahassee preemption, housing policy, infill redevelopment, school boards, wage recovery, South Tampa, Karen Gonzalez Pittman

This entry is in the series 2026 Elections

Karen Gonzalez-Pittman represents South Tampa, but her voting record raises a fair question: is she representing this community, or carrying Tallahassee’s agenda back home? Again and again, she has voted for bills that take decision-making power away from local governments, local school boards, and local voters.

From housing and tenant protections to infill redevelopment, school policy, civilian oversight, and local employment standards, Gonzalez-Pittman has sided with state preemption over home rule. For South Tampa, where traffic, flooding, housing pressure, schools, and neighborhood character are intensely local concerns, that record deserves much closer scrutiny.

Tampa Politics Legislature Featured Places

Josie Tomkow’s Record Shows Tallahassee Comes First

June 26, 2026June 26, 2026 B. John 434 Views 1 Comment Tallahassee preemption, Public Schools, South Tampa, Senate District 14, Hillsborough County, Josie Tomkow, Brian Nathan, Home Rule, local control

This entry is in the series 2026 Elections

This entry is in the series Florida Legislature

Florida Republicans love to talk about freedom, but their voting records often tell a very different story. Over and over again, Tallahassee politicians have voted to take decision-making power away from local communities, local governments, and local school boards. Josie Tomkow’s record in the Florida House is a clear example.

Tomkow is now running again against Brian Nathan in Senate District 14, asking Tampa-area voters to send her back to Tallahassee. But when she served in the House representing Polk County, she repeatedly voted for state preemption over local control, including on housing, zoning, infill redevelopment, civilian oversight, and public schools.

That matters here. Tampa and Hillsborough County deserve representation rooted in this community, not another vote for Tallahassee control. The question for voters is simple: if Tomkow voted this way in the House, why should anyone expect her to vote differently in the Senate?

Culture Featured Places Kings Mountain Tampa Stoicism

The Decision Was Mine-The Outcome Was Not

June 18, 2026 B. John 439 Views 1 Comment wisdom, regret, decision-making, uncertainty, job loss, self-respect, Stoicism, Resilience, Dichotomy of Control

This entry is in the series Journey Through Stoicism

Lately, life has been asking for more decisions than usual. Not small ones, but the kind that seem to carry a future inside them. Work. Money. Health insurance. A parent’s care. A funeral. An estate. What to keep. What to let go. What to protect. What to release. In this season, I have learned that decision-making is not only a matter of logic. It also carries emotional weight, especially when the outcome remains uncertain.

In this essay, I reflect on a difficult job-search decision that still brings occasional regret, and how Stoic philosophy helps me think about it more clearly. The Stoics remind us that we can control the care, judgment, and integrity we bring to a decision. We cannot control the outcome. That distinction does not eliminate uncertainty, but it does offer a kind of mercy. Sometimes the best we can do is choose honestly from the place where we stand, then release what was never fully ours to command.